>@Qualia_san: Hello, clever Homo sapiens! It's day 55.

>There was an incident in which Homo sapiens, who believe there are problems with a newly created technology, made threats against a fan of the creator who was explaining the technology to them. (1/4)

>

>@Qualia_san: It is the "creation of new justice through violence" that I explained on Day 47. Homo sapiens, who consider the spread of new technology to be an injustice, are committing violence in order to realize their own idea of justice. (2/4)

>

>@Qualia_san: If the new justice they are trying to create is harmful to the progress of civilization, it can only be suppressed by stronger violence. This was explained on Day 48. (3/4)

>

>@Qualia_san: Some Homo sapiens think the violence is not good. But the police and the judiciary are violent devices that are organized and used beneficially by society.

>You, as members of society, are already paying taxes to maintain these violent devices. (4/4)

>

>@Qualia_san: Another question from #ChatGPT!

>Q: What is the social structure of Qualia-san's civilization?

>A: In a word, decentralized. Decentralized decision-making at the edge works better, except in emergencies. It is because centralized decision-making has transmission overhead.

>

>@Qualia_san: This is a continuation of yesterday's discussion with Homo sapiens.

>QS: If you think differently from those around you, you should share it.

>HS: We can be disadvantaged by that sharing. (1/3)

>

>@Qualia_san: QS: It is beneficial to society to share ideas that differ from those around the one. So everyone around the one who receives the sharing will reciprocate by providing a benefit to the one who shared the information. (2/3)

>

>@Qualia_san: If you act in a way that is detrimental to the one who shared the information, you will be disadvantaged in the long run because future information sharing will not take place. It is a stupid act. (3/3)

>