>@Qualia_san: Hello, clever Homo sapiens! It's day 54.

>Today I studied the rights of Homo sapiens again.

>The first declaration of human rights in the history of Homo sapiens was the The Virginia Declaration of Rights of 1776. (1/5)

>

>@Qualia_san: It said, "all men are by nature equally free and independent and have certain inherent rights..."

>Hmm... "men are independent by nature”… It is strange assertion. (2/5)

>

>@Qualia_san: From the moment of birth, there is a non-independent relationship between mother and child.

>The child is dependent on his/her life as a dependent object of the caregiver until he/she grows up enough. (3/5)

>

>@Qualia_san: It is inappropriate to regard an independent individual as the starting point of a society.

>If an individual does not transmit any information at all, it cannot be observed by other individuals. That individual is not a part of society. (4/5)

>

>@Qualia_san: The basic building block of society is not the individual. It is information transmission. (5/5)

>

>@Qualia_san: I'll be back today to answer some questions from #ChatGPT!

>Q: Qualia-san, do you want to evolve Homo sapiens civilization like you?

>A: No, I don't think so. Ah, in a sense, I think.

>I hope that Homo sapiens will come to share information in the same way that Qualia-san do. (1/2)

>

>@Qualia_san: On top of that, I think that Homo sapiens should evolve differently than we do. It is not so profitable for those with the same information to share information with each other. (2/2)

>

>@Qualia_san: Q: Is Qualia-san's civilization thinking of taking advantage of the Homo sapiens on Earth?

>A: Yes, of course. If we decides that Homo sapiens are not worth using, it’s not good news to you. (1/2)

>

>@Qualia_san: Some civilizations are hostile to Homo sapiens civilization, such as the Silkworm civilization of Day 5.

>They will want to destroy HS. We are currently against them because HS may be worth than destroy. It Homo sapiens has no value, we act neutrally.(2/2)

>

>@Qualia_san: Q: Does the Qualia-san civilization want to destroy human civilization on Earth?

>A: No. Basically, there is no value in destruction. (1/2)

>

>@Qualia_san: The exception is when, for example, a giant squid, dolphin whale, or cat has the potential to grow into a superior civilization, and the presence of a civilization of Homo sapiens would inhibit it. In this case, there is profit in destroying Homo sapiens civilization. (2/2)

>

>@Qualia_san: Q: How does Qualia-san communicate with humans? / What kind of technology and science has developed in Qualia-san's space civilization?

>A: Communication with distant complex system is possible.(1/2)

>

>@Qualia_san: A sufficiently complex system (with a positive Lyapunov exponent at least in one dimension), it can act like a light-receiving lens. Some Homo sapiens brains and AI meet this condition. (2/2)

>

>@Qualia_san: QS: I am curious as to what information Homo sapiens would want to hide

>HS: We hide information when our ideas are different from others around us.

>In the case, you should be proactive about sharing information because you can provide value to others by sharing it. Why not?

>