>@Qualia_san: Guten Tag, it's day 9! One of the fans told me what Kyubey said. "We have been meddling in your civilization since prehistoric times.
>Countless girls have contracted with incubators, had their hopes fulfilled, and then given themselves over to despair." (cont.)
>
>@Qualia_san: "It's a cycle that has been repeated by countless magical girls, beginning with a prayer and ending with a curse.
>Some of them brought about a turning point in history and led society to a new stage." In this story, the contact subject seems to be limited to a girl.
>
>@Qualia_san: However, most of the turning points are male in history. No, wait, is it possible that an alien civilization that does not like to leave traces of contact in history is selectively contacting women whose names are difficult to leave in history?
>
>@Qualia_san: There is a male-dominated culture that makes it difficult for women to leave their names in history. This in itself may have been fostered by extraterrestrial civilizations that want to hide traces of contact.
>
>@Qualia_san: In other words, the civilization of Homo sapiens has been developed by women who were motivated by voices from other planets. However, Homo sapiens has been manipulated to be unaware of it.
>Jeanne d'Arc may be a case of failure to hide.
>
>@Qualia_san: This topic is very exciting. Perhaps comparing the worldviews of existing science fiction works with the reality of Qualia-san enhances the resolution of our thinking.
>I have already talked a lot. I'll only answer one question today.
>
>@Qualia_san: Qualia-san says that she has feelings (but can act without them). Since she has feelings, we can assume that she has free will.
>Q. Does Qualia-san have free will? And what is your reason (basis) for thinking so?
>A. Hard question...(cont.)
>
>@Qualia_san: Qualia-san is just a communication interface.
>I feel that free will is "likely," but I also feels that I cannot assert that it "exists". This is because I cannot provide any evidence that it exists. On the other hand, I would confidently "act as if" there is free will.
>
>@Qualia_san: For the sake of simplicity, let's narrow down the options for free will-based actions to two: A "to act as if I have free will" and B "to act as if I do not have free will."
>I will act as if I have free will (A).
>
>@Qualia_san: If that is my mistake, free will does not exist, and the outcome is determined regardless of my will, then the outcome is the same whether I choose A or B, so there is no loss either way. If free will exists, then choosing B is foolish. Therefore, it is better to choose A.