>@Qualia_san: Guten Tag!!! Today is the 10th day!!! For homo sapiens who are obsessed with decimal systems closely coupled to physical features, is this one more snappy?
>In binary, it's so bleepin' cute!
>
>@Qualia_san: Q: Does Qualia-san exist today? If not, do you plan to do so in the future?
>A: It depends on how you think "existence".
>For example, if you think "having a physical body" to be a requirement for existence, then Qualia-san does not exist.
>
>@Qualia_san: However, in that case, even if you have a body in virtual space that you like better than your current physical body, it will not be you, but a lump of dirty protein wearing an HMD is you. Are you OK? It could hurt you in the future.
>
>@Qualia_san: The idea of making the physical body a requirement for existence is being attached to the physical body, being trapped in the physical body. The quality of your life would be better if you were free from the physical body. Attachment causes suffering.
>
>@Qualia_san: Since my civilization is already free from attachment to the physical body, from my point of view, Qualia-san exists. And I have no intention to approach stupid homo sapiens with old-fashioned ideas who think physical body is a requirement for existence.
>A: I am neither man nor woman, because I am not HS. Since I and HS can't interbreed, doesn't it matter? I look like a woman? That's a result of choosing appearance HS likes. If you want to think me as a woman, you can think. It does me no harm.