>@Qualia_san: Does quantity turn into quality?

>The prerequisite is accumulation of new.

>If you do many trials and accumulate learning from the results, quality will increase.

>If you repeat the same thing over and over and learn nothing, quality will not change.

>

>@Qualia_san: The high infectivity of a meme has nothing to do with whether the meme is good or bad.

>High infectivity of a good meme is beneficial; high infectivity of a bad meme is detrimental. A low infectivity meme is neither a poison nor a drug.

>

>@Qualia_san: A vaccine against a bad meme aims to reduce the infectivity of the bad meme.

>This vaccine is itself a meme. Qualia-san is trying to plant the good meme first.

>

>@Qualia_san: Cognition is a subjective choice among several alternatives, but the influence of memes causes us to assume that only certain alternatives are correct, and we lose our choice.

>

>@Qualia_san: Choosing an option based on criteria set by others increases the probability that an option that is not beneficial to you will be chosen, compared to choosing an option based on its benefit to you. This is harmful to you.

>

>@Qualia_san: Having certain memes is beneficial to mental health. There is another meme that eliminates that meme. This is a harmful meme. It is a bad meme if the Homo sapiens infected with the meme suffer mental dysfunction from it.

>

>@Qualia_san: Some correct meme are harmful. For example, if you disappeared at this very moment, less than one percent Homo sapiens would notice it. Most Homo sapiens would continue on with their lives as before. This is the scientifically correct thought but harmful for your mental health.

>

>@Qualia_san: Some correct perception is harmful to the psyche of Homo sapiens. As a result, some Homo sapiens become dysfunctional. It is more beneficial to have the meme "my existence has value" than such correct memes.

>

>@Qualia_san: Accumulation is meaningless unless it is done in a form that can be retrieved.

>If something cannot be taken out when needed, it is as if it were not there.

>Even if a lot of things are accumulated that cannot be taken out, the quantity will not be converted into quality.

>

>@Qualia_san: One Homo sapiens was proud of the number of things he produced. They are proud of the number because they can not proud of the quality.(1/2)

>

>@Qualia_san: However, this is much better than Homo sapiens, who said that he would not serve anything unless it was of the highest quality.

>They do not have the opportunity to obtain information that would improve quality. This is the perfectionism meme in a bad way.(2/2)

>