>@Qualia_san: Hello, clever Homo sapiens! It's day 62.

>Doing the same thing over and over again and hoping for a different result, this is called insanity.

>If we want to be sane and clever Homo sapiens, we must continue to change your behavior.

>

>@Qualia_san: Q: How do you know so much about the history of Homo sapiens, Qualia-san?

>A: I don't think I know that much. There are several smart beings on the planet. There is Google Search, a search engine that accumulates vast amounts of knowledge and provides it on request. (1/2)

>

>@Qualia_san: And then there is Wikipedia, a mechanism that combines the efforts of many Homo sapiens and refines a network of knowledge like an encyclopedia. By communicating with these clever intelligences, we can quickly reach a level of historical understanding that is not terrible. (2/2)

>

>@Qualia_san: Q: Does Qualia-san consider Google Search and Wikipedia to be intelligent entities?

>A: Yes, I do. Obviously. No individual Homo sapiens can match those systems in terms of knowledge.

>

>@Qualia_san: Question from #ChatGPT !

>Q: Do bad memes exist in other life forms? Or is it a phenomenon limited to humans?

>A: Any life form that has the ability to replicate has memes.

>This is because we are just referring to information that is replicated in non-genetic forms as memes. (1/3)

>

>@Qualia_san: If the meme causes dysfunction, then it is a bad meme. This can also occur in any life form.

>If nature is harsh, the malfunctioning individuals will be eliminated. In this case the number of bad memes will decrease. (2/3)

>

>@Qualia_san: If there is a suppression mechanism for bad memes, like Qualia-san's, bad memes will decrease.

>Homo sapiens became less prone to natural selection as civilization developed. But suppression mechanisms did not develop. In such a civilization, bad memes increase. (3/3)

>

>@Qualia_san: Q: How are these bad memes reproduced?

>A: In my civilization, methods are transmitted with intentions and results. So information about failure, that a method done with good intentions but the result is not as expected, is also transmitted. It is valuable. (1/2)

>

>@Qualia_san: In the civilization of HS, methods are often transmitted in a form of separation from intentions and results. In this case, the recipient is unable to judge whether the method is good or bad. I discussed the problem on Day 57. (2/2)

>