>@Qualia_san: Hello, clever Homo sapiens! It's day 48.

>The reason some people repeat violence in the name of justice is that they are trying to create a new justice through violence.(1/2)

>

>@Qualia_san: If that new justice is favorable to the progress of civilization, then you can join in the violence. If it is not favorable, then you can disable those people with stronger violence.(2/2)

>

>@Qualia_san: Q: Often when there is a disaster on earth, commodities are bought up. Under these circumstances, those who follow the rules will suffer a relative loss. What kind of behavior is considered appropriate on Qualia-san's planet? (1/6)

>

>@Qualia_san: A: It is stupid to make rules that will cause you to lose money if you follow them and expect others to follow them. If it is more profitable to break the rules, then of course there will be Homo sapiens who break the rules. This is obvious if we observe reality properly. (2/6)

>

>@Qualia_san: Therefore, in this case, it is necessary to clarify what kind of behavior is ideal and what kind of behavior we want to discourage, and to enforce it with an effective system. (3/6)

>

>@Qualia_san: Suppose we want to stop buying up items that many people need and then resell them for a profit. First, make it illegal to sell or broker those goods. You can impose high fines or even jail them. Many countries have similar laws regarding the sale of stolen goods. (4/6)

>

>@Qualia_san: Then, we would have the police make a tip line and offer a reward to anyone who provides useful information. There are a lot of homo sapiens out there who are bored with being of no use to society. Let's give them some public justice. They will be happy to swing it around. (5/6)

>

>@Qualia_san: Oops, I didn't answer your question. On my planet, when someone buys more stuff than they need, that information is known to everyone through active information sharing. Few people do bad things because doing bad things will get them in trouble for the rest of their lives. (6/6)

>