>@Qualia_san: Hello, clever Homo sapiens! It's day 45.

>It is desirable to obtain information that other individuals do not have. This is because that information can be given to others. It is desirable to experiment. Because it is possible to obtain information that others do not have.

>

>@Qualia_san: One of Qualia-san's fans has done an experiment to see if Qualia-san fits the Golden Ratio!

>@amemy12963: @Qualia_san クオリアさん、気付いてしまいました。

>クオリアさんの姿は、フィボナッチ数を使った黄金比でできていますね？！

>元画像：@Qualia_San

>

>@Qualia_san: Thanks for the interesting experiment! Qualia-san did the experiment too!

>To see the contribution of being in the golden ratio , I prepared a rectangle that is not in the golden ratio and a spiral distorted to that ratio. (1/6)

>

>@Qualia_san: In one instance, I found the composition to be of excellent proportions, with the roundness of the head, the tips of the ears, the flow of the ear tufts, and the shadow lines in the background! (2/6)

>

>@Qualia_san: Another example shows Qualia-san's eyes, the flow of her hair, the placement of her other eye, the roundness of her head, and even the bouncy ends of her hair, all in excellent proportions (3/6)

>

>@Qualia_san: Which ratio was the most convincing? What I mean is that this figure, which combines many feature points and spirals of varying curvature, can be fitted to an image regardless of whether or not its aspect ratio is the golden ratio. (4/6)

>

>@Qualia_san: By the way, Qualia-san thinks the golden ratio is beautiful for a slightly different reason. The golden ratio is a ratio that satisfies the property that "subtracting one from that ratio gives the inverse ratio . (5/6)

>

>@Qualia_san: By that property, the isosceles triangle removed from the isosceles triangle at the outer edge of the pentagram is also an isosceles triangle. And it is a similar shape. I think this is very beautiful. (6/6)

>

>@Qualia_san: Q&A~

>Q: Does the type of communication interface(CI) affect Qualia-san's love?

>A: It doesn't matter what type of CI, but it does matter that the communication is planet-wide. Otherwise...well, I can't find a good word for it, but I would venture to say that it is “unattractive".

>