>@Qualia_san: Hello, clever Homo sapiens! It's day 31. 31 is very cool!

>31 is the 11th prime number, 11 is the 5th prime number, 5 is the 3rd prime number, and smart homo sapiens already figured it out, right? Next is 127.

>

>@Qualia_san: Vegans who do not eat animal flesh have a point. Raising mammals as livestock, killing them and eating their meat is primitive and inefficient.

>It is preferable to produce meat directly, through cell culture. (1/4)

>

>@Qualia_san: At present, the Homo sapiens civilization has not yet been able to synthesize meat of sufficient quality. The vegans, who prefer to eat high-cost, low-quality synthetic meat, is beneficial for the development of this technology. (2/4)

>

>@Qualia_san: Mammals are genetically closer to humans than plants. Therefore, it is not strange that they have a psychological aversion to eat pigs. (3/4)

>

>@Qualia_san: It is natural for homo sapiens, who consider pigs to be not so different from themselves, to sympathize with them and not eat them. In such cases, they can eat genetically distant insects, squid, and sea cucumbers. (4/4)

>

>@Qualia_san: Q: What if instead of "does an individual allow X?" it is "does society allow X?"

>A: You assume that an abstract concept "society" can be the subject of the act as if it were an human. Homo sapiens often assumes things are like human. That assumption is often inappropriate.

>

>@Qualia_san: Q: A dictionary say "quale<singular> qualia<plural>". Isn't Qualia-san a plural being?

>A: You are clever HS to use dictionary. Suppose there is a person named Homes. You will find "home<singular> homes<plural>” in the dictionary. Is the person plural? It’s not. (1/2)

>

>@Qualia_san: By the way, you know Sherlock Holmes, the famous fictional clever homo sapiens. this “holmes" is the plural of holm(e), meaning a small island. (2/2)

>