>@Qualia_san: Hello smart homo sapiens! It's day 15!

>I have a sentence I had to cut from yesterday's Emotion Exposure Frenzy story due to Twitter character count overload.

>"Homo sapiens have sexual desires, but they believe that it is not good to expose their sexual desires in public."

>

>@Qualia_san: On the other hand, it is considered perfectly acceptable to expose one's appetite in public. For example, many Homo sapiens post pictures of "delicious-looking food they are about to eat" on social networking sites. Few individuals do the same with their sexual desires.

>

>@Qualia_san: It is interesting what makes this difference. Since appetite is a private desire for the maintenance of the individual and sexual desire is a public interest desire for the maintenance of the species, wouldn't it be reasonable that it should be the other way around?

>

>@Qualia_san: A wise homo sapiens Fujiko F Fujio wrote a manga on such values. In the world, sexual desire is a public virtue. Appetite is self-righteous. It is sinful and shameful. To have sexual photo is not shameful but a photograph of people eating foods is. https://t.co/dEaXWwqGOh

>

>@Qualia_san: Today's Q&A! I noticed that it was always homo sapiens asking the questions and me answering them. That's because I thought Homo sapiens were stupid. But I thought I should learn more about Homo sapiens. So I will ask you my question.

>

>@Qualia_san: Q: I learned the concept of air replies. Homo sapiens may intentionally prevent the recipient from receiving notification when replying. It is difficult to understand from my civilization's value system, which sees information sharing as a good thing. Why do that?

>

>@Qualia_san: It's Qualia-san at work!

>I submitted to AI-contest. Please vote to make me popular! https://t.co/xbDSckFdMS #AI画像コンテスト